Two schools have been selected to receive an additional year of support through the Middle School Matters Institute (MSMI), including on-site professional development and ongoing coaching from national education experts and the necessary resources to implement proven strategies in mathematics.
Advanced Studies Magnet–Haut Gap Middle School in Johns Island, South Carolina, and Uplift Mighty Preparatory in Fort Worth, Texas, were selected after submitting detailed proposals that outlined goals for the 2015–2016 school year and described the benefits of continued support. Haut Gap originally was selected to receive support through MSMI in the 2014–2015 school year; Uplift Mighty was selected in the 2013–2014 school year.
MSMI is an initiative of the George W. Bush Institute in partnership with The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. MSMI develops and disseminates resources that increase access to research on and proven practical strategies for middle school improvement. The goal of MSMI is to increase the number of students well prepared for high school and postsecondary success. MSMI is part of the Bush Institute's Middle School Matters program.
Tags: Middle School Matters Institute
Marc Marschark, director of the Center for Education Research Partnerships in New York, will present "Myths and Misunderstandings in Deaf Education (and Why You Should Care)" from 12:30 to 2 p.m. on September 23 in the Dean's Conference Room (Room 238) of the Sanchez Building at UT Austin. No RSVP is needed to attend.
"Recent research indicating that deaf children learn differently [from] their hearing peers in several domains and are more diverse in their knowledge and learning strategies should allow us to build on their strengths and accommodate their needs (if anyone were willing to accept the evidence)," Marschark writes, noting the performance gap between deaf learners and their hearing peers that persists despite progress in deaf education.
The Center for Education Research Partnerships is within the Rochester Institute of Technology's National Technical Institute for the Deaf. For more information on the presenter, visit Marschark's profile page.
Tags: Deaf and Hard of Hearing Institute
"Deeper Learning for Students With Disabilities," a newly published report by MCPER Executive Director Sharon Vaughn and colleagues, is now available free of charge.
The report—part of the Deeper Learning Research Series, which is published by Jobs for the Future's Students at the Center initiative—explores "core instructional practices that are feasible to implement in every classroom and that facilitate learning for students with many kinds of needs." The authors also argue that "the field of special education has important insights and expertise to share with the deeper learning movement in general."
To learn more about the series and download this report, visit the Jobs for the Future website.
MCPER has published a code sheet that researchers can use to systematically gather information and data from studies identified for inclusion in syntheses and meta-analyses. These data include (but are not limited to) study participant characteristics, intervention components, treatment fidelity, and student outcomes. The accompanying manual provides guidelines for coder training, achieving reliability in using the code sheets, and data entry formatting and tips. The tool is free for researchers to use, but appropriate citation is required. To download the code sheet and manual and view the required citation, visit the MCPER Library.
Several MCPER researchers have already used the code sheet in their syntheses and meta-analyses. Click the links in the following list to read the studies.
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300.
Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M. S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., & Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research, Center on Instruction.
Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2013). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication.
Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2011). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication.
Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Ciullo, S. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889–912.
Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 541–561.
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M., & Capin, P. (2015). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K–3. Educational Psychology Review, 1–26.
Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., & Reutebuch, C. K. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 21, 317–347.
MCPER researchers have been awarded a $3.5 million, 4-year federal grant to gauge the effectiveness of different professional development models aimed at vocabulary and reading comprehension instruction in fourth-grade content area classes.
In each research year of the new project—Examining the Efficacy of Differential Levels of Professional Development for Teaching Content Area Reading Strategies—60 fourth-grade teachers and their students will join the study. Teachers will attend an annual conference at UT Austin, where they will learn the vocabulary and comprehension components they will use in their classrooms over the course of the school year. The project will measure and compare the effectiveness of professional development versus a control condition in the first year and then compare different types of professional development in subsequent years.
Elizabeth Swanson will lead the project as principal investigator with MCPER Executive Director Sharon Vaughn and Associate Director Greg Roberts as co-principal investigators. The funding is through the National Center for Education Research.
MCPER has received a $1.2 million, 5-year federal grant to train doctoral students in the field of learning disabilities and behavior disorders.
The purpose of the project is to prepare five highly qualified doctoral graduates who can bridge the gap between research and practice by becoming leaders who are well trained in multitiered systems of support for students with learning disabilities and behavior disorders. The project will employ a research-to-practice leadership model that engages the collaborative efforts of the faculty in the UT Austin Department of Special Education, professional development and policy leaders at MCPER and the Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts, and school district leaders. Mathematics Institute Director Diane Pedrotty Bryant will be the principal investigator of the project, and MCPER Executive Director Sharon Vaughn will be the co-principal investigator.
The funding is from the Office of Special Education Programs within the U.S. Department of Education.
Three school districts in two states have been selected as the third cohort of sites to receive guidance from nationally recognized experts in research-based instructional strategies through the Middle School Matters Institute.
Etiwanda School District in Southern California and Pharr–San Juan–Alamo and San Angelo independent school districts in Texas were selected after a rigorous review process. District leadership teams and leaders from two schools in each district will attend the third annual Middle School Matters Institute Summer Conference in June in Austin, Texas. In the 2015–2016 school year, the districts will implement what they learned at the conference with support from a team of experts.
The Middle School Matters program is an initiative of the George W. Bush Institute in partnership with The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. For more information, read the press release from the George W. Bush Institute.
Tags: Middle School Matters Institute
Diane Pedrotty Bryant, director of the MCPER Mathematics Institute for Learning Disabilities and Difficulties, recently delivered a Distinguished Lecture and Distinguished Research Talk on mathematics and students with mathematics difficulties and disabilities at Purdue University. The talks were supported by funding from that National Science Foundation and the Purdue University College of Education Office of Discovery and Faculty Development to Purdue's Dr. Yan Ping Xin.
MCPER has received a $3 million federal grant to test a word problem intervention for third-graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties.
The new 3-year project—Developing Connections Between Word Problems and Mathematical Equations to Promote Word Problem Performance Among Students With Mathematics Difficulty—will assess whether equation-solving instruction conducted within the context of word problem intervention leads to improved word problem solving for this population of students. Each year, the project will recruit 150 third-grade students with or at risk for mathematics difficulties and provide individual intervention to 100 students. Sarah Powell with serve as principal investigator of the project, with Marcia Barnes as the co-principal investigator, MCPER Associate Director Greg Roberts as the methodologist, and Lynn Fuchs of Vanderbilt University and Jon Star of Harvard University as consultants.
The funding is from the National Center for Special Education Research within the Institute of Education Sciences, the research arm of the U.S. Department of Education.
The Building Response to Intervention Capacity for Texas Schools project has released a new a "how-to" module for its Campus Response to Intervention Progress Monitoring Tool (RTI-PMT), a free app for electronic tablets and computers.
The RTI-PMT provides real-time data on how an elementary campus’ RTI model is working during an academic year. It promotes collaboration among grade-level teams in identifying entry and exit criteria for each intervention setting (or tier) and proactive decision-making related to resources and professional development support. The tool is simple to use: After each screening assessment, educators enter the names of their at-risk students and assign an intervention setting. The app organizes and displays data at the teacher, grade, and campus levels in pie charts or bar charts. When data are updated at the beginning, middle, and end of year, the displays show progress in meeting students’ needs, as students move to less intensive settings or exit intervention. The tool also can be used to share campus success with stakeholders.
For more information and to access both the module and the app, visit the Building RTI Capacity website.